#1 12-05-26 14:37

STATE
Member

sp6culation/4MNIFSTO

Offline

#2 12-05-30 16:00

Vampyrik
Member

Re: sp6culation/4MNIFSTO

Offline

#3 12-05-30 20:20

McAlec
Member

Re: sp6culation/4MNIFSTO

Last edited by McAlec (12-05-30 20:56)

Offline

#4 12-05-31 01:55

Re: sp6culation/4MNIFSTO

Last edited by genericboringposter (12-06-03 16:18)

Offline

#5 12-05-31 08:13

STATE
Member

Re: sp6culation/4MNIFSTO

Offline

#6 12-06-02 22:07

McAlec
Member

Re: sp6culation/4MNIFSTO

Offline

#7 12-06-03 16:18

Re: sp6culation/4MNIFSTO

Thanks, McAlec. I've revised the last several lines to reflect your ideas.

Offline

#8 12-06-04 08:57

STATE
Member

Re: sp6culation/4MNIFSTO

Offline

#9 12-06-04 16:32

McAlec
Member

Re: sp6culation/4MNIFSTO

So close, yet so far.

I can do nothing to improve what you have already, Generic, but I'd say maybe unblur the lines between the principles and intentions and what kind of future MetaCorp is. I get how the questions are very much the same, but maybe a clearer separation of the answers would get us up the last half step.

Offline

#10 12-06-05 23:29

Re: sp6culation/4MNIFSTO

I'm thinking that the problem may be that I'm being too wordy and not coherent enough early. I'm going to try another response below.

Offline

#11 12-06-05 23:30

Re: sp6culation/4MNIFSTO

Offline

#12 12-06-06 13:17

STATE
Member

Re: sp6culation/4MNIFSTO

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB